First it was a deterrent. Then it wasn’t. It was a new Justice Department policy. Then it wasn’t. The administration was simply following the law. Then it said separations weren’t required by law. It could not be reversed by executive order. Then it was.
from Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis https://ift.tt/2lkrZvg
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
By BY EITAN D. HERSH from NYT Opinion https://ift.tt/38L2rhL
-
By BY NEW YORK TIMES AUDIO from NYT Podcasts https://ift.tt/8Zjh7kA
-
By BY NEW YORK TIMES AUDIO from NYT Podcasts https://ift.tt/MAm51p4
No comments:
Post a Comment